The Matter With Kansas (XVIII) - the True Significance of O mhcanismoz twn Antikuqhrwn
So, OK, Galileo didn't have a camera phone, but some ancient Greeks had a pretty decent analog computer; see also Scientists Unravel Mystery of Ancient Greek Machine.
Besides shutting down some conspiracy/revisionist history theories, since it's not such an unexplained mystery after all, I think the most important lesson to be drawn is in the final two paragraphs of John Noble Wilford's fine NYTimes story:
Dr. [François] Charette [of the University of Munich museum] noted that more than 1,000 years elapsed before instruments of such complexity are known to have re-emerged. A few artifacts and some Arabic texts suggest that simpler geared calendrical devices had existed, particularly in Baghdad around A.D. 900.
It seems clear, Dr. Charette said, that “much of the mind-boggling technological sophistication available in some parts of the Hellenistic and Greco-Roman world was simply not transmitted further,” adding, “The gear-wheel, in this case, had to be reinvented.”
There's a world of difference between having a few smart guys around -- even guys as smart as Hipparchos of Rhodes, "who ... might have had a hand in designing the device" -- and having perpetuated institutions dedicated to preserving and transmitting accumulated tecne. Science has no functional existence apart from such institutions.
(As dramatic as the Antikythera Mechanism is, comparable examples exist from other cultures. Bruce Bolt's Earthquakes and Geological Discovery, part of the Scientific American Library series, notes that this passage is a strikingly modern description of the action of a strike-slip fault. But the insight of Zechariah son of Berechiah son of Iddo did not jump-start the science of geology; the requisite institutions did not exist. Similarly, Manfred Schroeder notes in Fractals, Chaos, Power Laws: Minutes from an Infinite Paradise that Pharaoh's dream describes actual events resulting from the "black noise" spectrum of the Nile (f-b, where b > 2). No sudden advance in mathematics resulted -- there was no institution capable of capitalizing on Joseph's interpretation.)
An immediate corollary of this idea is that an attack on science is not an attack on a set of findings; it is an attack on institutions. Science as we know it did not exist in classical times (science falsely so called, indeed), because its institutions did not exist; and opposition to it now, with such shallow motivations as those we see in the ongoing conflict in Kansas, is an ironic and singularly unfortunate violation of this wise admonition.
(Previous member of series here; separately, the esteemed Bill Walker of Mayo points me to Kansas Outlaws Practice of Evolution.)
PS - Hey, there's a song about it!
Pluto's Not A Planet Anymore.
Hat tip: Neta Apple, ASKC.
Texas Star Party Reservations Open
Here is the text, modified so as to embed the links, of an e-mail I just received:
2007 Texas Star Party - Sign up Now!
The great tradition of dark sky observing continues with the 29th Annual TEXAS STAR PARTY, May 13 - 20, 2007! TSP WILL NOT BE MAILING A FLYER this year, so keep this e-mail or print it out!
Note: If you have already filled out the TSP form and received a reply email with your choices, then there is no need to submit another form.
Questions? Visit our web site or e-mail for the latest and complete details!
We look forward to seeing you next May!
Sincerely,
the volunteers for Texas Star Party
Top Ten Astronomical Outreach Events for 2007
In any given year, amateur astronomers have numerous excellent opportunities to present astronomy to the public, which are a combination of several factors:
Here are some outreach opportunities for 2007, ranked by increasing distance, beginning with terrestrial events and ending with deep-sky observation. Information is derived from websites linked below and from the Observer’s Handbook 2007, Space.com, the US Naval Observatory, and YourSky; it is somewhat specific to the KC area, but can easily be modified for your location.
A chronological listing might look like this:
Leonid Meteor Shower This Weekend
Graze on over to the International Meteor Organization's October to December 2006 page and skip down a bit:
This year may bring a return to still higher Leonid activity, perhaps with ZHRs of 100—150. The timing above (Maximum: November 17, 20h50m UT [Fri 17 Nov, 2:50 PM CST]) is for the nodal crossing, and if recent past years are a guide, any associated activity near then may be swamped by other filaments within the stream. The prediction of higher (though not storm!) rates from the 1933 filament by Rob McNaught and David Asher is timed for November 19, 4h45m UT [Sat 18 Nov, 10:45 PM CST].
Here's where the radiant will be -- in the head of Leo, which looks like a large backwards question mark; click on image for full-size (640 × 480) map:
At my latitude (~40° N), the radiant will be rising in the east-northeast around 11 PM CST. If the prediction quoted by the IMO holds up, the first hour or two of Saturday night's portion of the shower may be spectacular for observers in the eastern half of North America.
(Previous mentions of the Leonid shower on Arcturus occur in the unimaginatively-titled posts Leonid Observing Reports?, which recounts the brief but overwhelming meteor storm of '02, and Leonid Observing Report, from 2003.)
Look in, look out, look around ...
This 14-frame movie [551 kB *.mpg] shows a swirling cloud mass centered on the south pole, around which winds blow at 550 kilometers (350 miles) per hour. The frames have been aligned to make the planet appear stationary, while the sun appears to revolve about the pole in a counterclockwise direction. The clouds inside the dark, inner circle are lower than the surrounding clouds, which cast a shadow that follows the sun.
Main story here; movie and caption here.
We twist the world and ride the wind ...
Via The Scientist, I found Redshift Productions, complete with Jovian dog (page down, and ponder what Simak would think). I'm adding them to the blogroll under "Info Sites."
"Our tribe gives no brownie points for communicating with the public," says Carl Djerassi. Time to start handing them out; see the book referenced in my slightly out-of control post The Matter With Kansas (VIII) - Teach the Controversy!, and also this summary of the book's key points.
But I digress. Go get 'em, Redshift.
Transit of Mercury, Photoblogged
We deliver. Click on the images for full-size (2288 × 1712; ~500 kB *.jpg) versions.
This is me during the event. Telescope is described here; solar filter is from HMS Beagle in Parkville. All photos taken with Nikon Coolpix 4800, handheld.
Also, happy 350th, Edmund Halley.
-- is Wednesday. Diagram here; map of visibility for North American observers here. Locally, it starts at 1:12 PM CST, with the Sun 32° above the horizon; greatest transit is at 3:40 PM CST, with the sun 14° above the horizon; and transit ends at sunset (5:10 PM CST).
I am taking the day off to observe it -- weather forecast, as of 72 hours out, is highly favorable, but I want to be able to drive some distance if needed to get clear skies. I will post an update here if there is any organized event at either Powell or Warkoczewski Observatories.
Persons in the US wishing to find out about local observing should contact the nearest club. Finally, the transit will be viewable online at:
Hat tips: Dr Eric Flescher of the ASKC and Francis Reddy of Astronomy.
UPDATE: At least two ASKCers, one of whom is me, will be at Powell Observatory for the event.
For All Saints' Day, that is.